"POOR PARSI" might be the richest "poor indian"


Poor Parsi might be the richest "poor indian"

The Bombay Parsi Punchayet (BPP) on Monday told the Bombay high court that it had revised the definition of a poor Parsi as one who earns up to Rs 90,000 a month, in order to be eligible for a subsidized community apartment. The BPP, which controls over 5,000 flats in the city, had earlier fixed this amount at under Rs 50,000 a month. There are an estimated 45,000 Parsis in Mumbai. Read More

Earlier, In a shocking affidavit figures announced by Planning Commission of India that poverty line defines Rs 28.65 per capita per day for cities and 22.42 for rural areas. Government had faced a lot criticism for such an unrealistic definition regarding poverty and claiming that India's poverty decreasing year on year calculated by these figures. The affidavit filed in supreme court showed this laughable estimation of survival earnings in urban and rural area. After, such a bugaboo, figures revised and calculated based on National Sample Survey for 2009-10.  If average monthly consumption expenditure is taken as the benchmark of what an individual needs to survive, the poverty line would be Rs 66.10 for urban areas and Rs 35.10 for rural regions, while about 65% of the population will be below this cut-off. It has raised with little realistic figures.

The controversy over the calculation of the Planning Commission and providing such an unrealistic statistics drew a lot of criticism and people realized that the UPA II government is just playing around in terms of actual "inclusive" growth, that has announced in the 12th plan of the planning commission. With such a stubborn inflation, how one can survive below 30 Rs a day income, Planning commission has shown that poverty decreasing since 1995-96, albeit below the defined target. The question is the illusive way they are presenting the figures are the reasons for the decreasing the poverty.As such it is still rising and nowadays even middle class people has started to feel the economic crunch as of dealing with higher inflation and l steady income rise. Government want to create an illusion that UPA II is working towards inclusive growth, but it's only misguiding people of the country and allowing private players to exploit the domestic markets.

Government should realize the meaning of inclusive growth and spur the domestic consumption story rather than transnational businesses through finance related globalization. People in India are being compromised in terms of social welfare and security. Government is busy making reform oriented policies by involving more and more private sector institutions in national resources. People must raise a voice against deteriorating social life and personal development in the sack of globalization.

One might think that It's good to be a "POOR PARSI " rather than "poor indian" or "POOR PARSI" might be the richest "poor indian"
Tags: , ,

About author

Make it happen !!

1 comments

  1. The whole headlines are again factually misinterpreted as they were before last year. The fact is that the Parsi community has pegged someone earning rs 90,000/- a month as someone whop can on his/her own feet buy a flat with his own money or can take a loan for doing so instead of relying on charity. This is actually quite reasonable. It also allows truly deserving to get subsidised assets. . In any case sensationalising this issue as done previously by Ms Rosy Sequira on the same issue to get headlines is portraying a wrong picture of Parsis being only Rich'. The Parsis are already facing adversaries in terms of influence and reservation for Jobs, such headlines gives others an excuse to reposition a bawa/bawi last in the queue again for jobs etc and also instigates a haterd towards us thru jealously. Sequira and the clan are of those senstaionalists who think and portray Parsis as not aiding India in her freedom struggle or in the armed forces though we ratio wise outdid all others or infact even of others combined their efforts all in one. Shame on sequira on doing this again!''

Leave a Reply